waltenvswolltenTell them apart

Which to use

“walten” and “wollten” are a confusable German pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.

#20,786
“walten” frequency rank
#1,048
“wollten” frequency rank
21834
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature walten wollten
Definition eine bestimmende oder herrschende Funktion erfüllen 1. Person Plural Indikativ Präteritum Aktiv des Verbs wollen

Where the eye mixes walten and wollten

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 5 letters in sequence. walten runs 6 letters (CVCCVC) against wollten's 7 (CVCCCVC) - the length gap alone is often enough to separate them once you know to check it.

6 ch
walten
7 ch
wollten

Visual trap between walten and wollten

A purely visual mix-up. walten ([ˈvaltn̩]) and wollten ([ˈvɔltn̩]) are said differently, so reading them aloud is the quickest way to catch the wrong one. On the page they stay close: they differ by 1 letter(s) in length. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 21834, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

walten is recorded at frequency rank #20,786, classified as averb, pronounced [ˈvaltn̩]. wollten is at rank #1,048, tagged as averb, pronounced [ˈvɔltn̩].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 21834, this pair ranks #1,881,597 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - a relatively easy-to-tell-apart pair.

Orthographic DNA of walten vs wollten

Shared letters: elntw. Private to "walten": a. Private to "wollten": o.

"walten" · 6 letters · shape CVCCVC  ·  "wollten" · 7 letters · shape CVCCCVC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • walten ← awlten · waletn · wallten · waltenn · waltne · waltten · watlen · wlaten
  • wollten ← owllten · wlolten · wolletn · wolltenn · wolltne · wolltten · wolten · woltlen

Frequently Asked Questions

Can "walten" and "wollten" be used interchangeably?
No. They are said differently ([ˈvaltn̩] versus [ˈvɔltn̩]) and carry different meanings; reading the sentence aloud is usually enough to catch the wrong one.
Frequency check: "walten" vs "wollten" - which ranks higher?
"wollten" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #1,048 in our German list, against #20,786 for "walten". That is a wide gap, so in ordinary text the rarer spelling is the one worth double-checking.

After this comparison

Visual near-miss handled. Browse the word pages or a neighbour when the next look-alike shows up.

  • Full dictionary entry for "walten" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "wollten" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #1,881,597 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "walten" and "wollten" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "walten vs waste". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #1,881,597 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list