wagtvsWegsTell them apart

Quick tell: wagt is a verb, Wegs is a noun, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“wagt” is a verb and “Wegs” is a noun - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#10,398
“wagt” frequency rank
#33,904
“Wegs” frequency rank
44302
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature wagt Wegs
Definition 3. Person Singular Indikativ Präsens Aktiv des Verbs wagen Genitiv Singular des Substantivs Weg

Where the eye mixes wagt and Wegs

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 2 letters in sequence. wagt and Wegs follow the identical consonant-vowel pattern (CVCC). Same shape at a glance is often the real trap, independent of shared letters.

4 ch
wagt
4 ch
Wegs

Visual trap between wagt and Wegs

These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: wagt is [vaːkt] while Wegs is [veːks]. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they share most of their letters but differ in 2 positions, and the parts of speech differ too (verb vs noun), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 44302, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

wagt is recorded at frequency rank #10,398, classified as averb, pronounced [vaːkt]. Wegs is at rank #33,904, tagged as anoun, pronounced [veːks].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 44302, this pair ranks #1,390,616 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of wagt vs Wegs

Shared letters: gw. Private to "wagt": at. Private to "Wegs": es.

"wagt" · 4 letters · shape CVCC  ·  "Wegs" · 4 letters · shape CVCC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • wagt ← awgt · waggt · wagtt · watg · wgat · wwagt
  • Wegs ← ewgs · weggs · wegss · wesg · wges · wwegs

Frequently Asked Questions

Can "wagt" and "Wegs" be used interchangeably?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "wagt" is a verb and "Wegs" a noun, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
Frequency check: "wagt" vs "Wegs" - which ranks higher?
"wagt" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #10,398 in our German list, against #33,904 for "Wegs". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

Useful next steps

Pronunciation already separates them, if the page still looks alike, the dictionary links below settle it.

  • Full dictionary entry for "wagt" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "Wegs" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #1,390,616 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "wagt" and "Wegs" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "Wegs vs went". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #1,390,616 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list