verlegtvsverliertConfusable pair

Which to use

“verlegt” and “verliert” are a confusable German pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.

#4,312
“verlegt” frequency rank
#2,223
“verliert” frequency rank
6535
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature verlegt verliert
Definition Partizip Perfekt des Verbs verlegen 3. Person Singular Präsens Indikativ des Verbs verlieren

Where the eye mixes verlegt and verliert

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 6 letters in sequence. verlegt runs 7 letters (CVCCVCC) against verliert's 8 (CVCCVVCC) - the length gap alone is often enough to separate them once you know to check it.

7 ch
verlegt
8 ch
verliert

Visual trap between verlegt and verliert

A purely visual mix-up. verlegt ([fɛɐ̯ˈleːkt]) and verliert ([fɛɐ̯ˈliːɐ̯t]) are said differently, so reading them aloud is the quickest way to catch the wrong one. On the page they stay close: they differ by 1 letter(s) in length. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 6535, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

verlegt is recorded at frequency rank #4,312, classified as averb, pronounced [fɛɐ̯ˈleːkt]. verliert is at rank #2,223, tagged as averb, pronounced [fɛɐ̯ˈliːɐ̯t].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 6535, this pair ranks #1,991,302 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - a relatively easy-to-tell-apart pair.

Orthographic DNA of verlegt vs verliert

Shared letters: elrtv. Private to "verlegt": g. Private to "verliert": i.

"verlegt" · 7 letters · shape CVCCVCC  ·  "verliert" · 8 letters · shape CVCCVVCC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • verlegtevrlegt · velregt · verelgt · verleggt · verlegtt · verletg · verlget · verllegt
  • verliertevrliert · velriert · verilert · verleirt · verlierrt · verliertt · verlietr · verliret

Frequently Asked Questions

Is swapping "verlegt" for "verliert" ever safe?
No. They are said differently ([fɛɐ̯ˈleːkt] versus [fɛɐ̯ˈliːɐ̯t]) and carry different meanings; reading the sentence aloud is usually enough to catch the wrong one.
Frequency check: "verlegt" vs "verliert" - which ranks higher?
"verliert" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #2,223 in our German list, against #4,312 for "verlegt". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

After this comparison

Pronunciation already separates them, if the page still looks alike, the dictionary links below settle it.

  • Full dictionary entry for "verlegt" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "verliert" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #1,991,302 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "verlegt" and "verliert" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "verliert vs vorliest". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #1,991,302 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list