verflogenvsverfügenWhat's the difference?

Which to use

“verflogen” and “verfügen” are a confusable German pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.

#37,863
“verflogen” frequency rank
#4,839
“verfügen” frequency rank
42702
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature verflogen verfügen
Definition Partizip Perfekt des Verbs verfliegen als Person/Stelle mit Befugnis/Befehlsgewalt anordnen, dass etwas Genanntes geschehen soll

Where the eye mixes verflogen and verfügen

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 7 letters in sequence. verflogen runs 9 letters (CVCCCVCVC) against verfügen's 8 (CVCCVCVC) - the length gap alone is often enough to separate them once you know to check it.

9 ch
verflogen
8 ch
verfügen

Look-alike desk: verflogen vs verfügen

A purely visual mix-up. verflogen ([fɛɐ̯ˈfloːɡn̩]) and verfügen ([fɛɐ̯ˈfyːɡn̩]) are said differently, so reading them aloud is the quickest way to catch the wrong one. On the page they stay close: they differ by 1 letter(s) in length. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 42702, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

verflogen is recorded at frequency rank #37,863, classified as averb, pronounced [fɛɐ̯ˈfloːɡn̩]. verfügen is at rank #4,839, tagged as averb, pronounced [fɛɐ̯ˈfyːɡn̩].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 42702, this pair ranks #1,441,227 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of verflogen vs verfügen

Shared letters: efgnrv. Private to "verflogen": lo. Private to "verfügen": ü.

"verflogen" · 9 letters · shape CVCCCVCVC  ·  "verfügen" · 8 letters · shape CVCCVCVC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • verflogen ← evrflogen · vefrlogen · verfflogen · verflgoen · verfllogen · verfloegn · verflogenn · verfloggen

Frequently Asked Questions

Can "verflogen" and "verfügen" be used interchangeably?
No. They are said differently ([fɛɐ̯ˈfloːɡn̩] versus [fɛɐ̯ˈfyːɡn̩]) and carry different meanings; reading the sentence aloud is usually enough to catch the wrong one.
Which is more common, "verflogen" or "verfügen"?
"verfügen" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #4,839 in our German list, against #37,863 for "verflogen". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

Useful next steps

Pronunciation already separates them, if the page still looks alike, the dictionary links below settle it.

  • Full dictionary entry for "verflogen" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "verfügen" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #1,441,227 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "verflogen" and "verfügen" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "verflogen vs verlogene". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #1,441,227 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list