Which to use
“verfangen” is a verb and “verlangten” is an adjective - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.
- #40,277
- “verfangen” frequency rank
- #19,067
- “verlangten” frequency rank
- 59344
- confusion score
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | verfangen | verlangten |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | den gewünschten oder beabsichtigten Erfolg haben; wirken | Genitiv Singular Maskulinum der starken Flexion des Positivs des Adjektivs verlangt |
Where the spellings diverge
Shared letters are muted; the letters that actually set verfangen and verlangten apart are highlighted. They share 8 letters in sequence, which is exactly why the eye skips the difference.
Spelling & Dictionary Insight
verfangen and verlangten form a confusable pair in the German index, two distinct headwords that are easily confused because they look alike, sound alike, or both. They differ by 1 letter(s) in length - close enough that the eye skips over the difference, far enough that meaning fully diverges. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 59344, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.
verfangen is recorded at frequency rank #40,277, classified as averb, pronounced [fɛɐ̯ˈfaŋən]. verlangten is at rank #19,067, tagged as anadj, pronounced [fɛɐ̯ˈlaŋtn̩].
Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.
With a confusion score of 59344, this pair ranks #828,002 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.
Frequency comparison
Frequently Asked Questions
Can "verfangen" and "verlangten" be used interchangeably?
Remembering verfangen vs verlangten
The fastest way to pick the right one every time.
- Check the role first: if you need a verb, it's “verfangen”; for an adjective, it's “verlangten”.
- See each word in full, definition, IPA, etymology and its other confusables. Full “verfangen” entry
- Browse more pairs most likely to be confused. Most confusable