umfassenvsumfasstenConfusable pair

Quick tell: umfassen is a verb, umfassten is an adjective, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“umfassen” is a verb and “umfassten” is an adjective - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#8,643
“umfassen” frequency rank
#48,564
“umfassten” frequency rank
57207
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature umfassen umfassten
Definition etwas umgreifen, umfangen, umgeben Genitiv Singular Maskulinum der starken Flexion des Positivs des Adjektivs umfasst

Where the eye mixes umfassen and umfassten

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 8 letters in sequence. umfassen runs 8 letters (VCCVCCVC) against umfassten's 9 (VCCVCCCVC) - the length gap alone is often enough to separate them once you know to check it.

8 ch
umfassen
9 ch
umfassten

Visual trap between umfassen and umfassten

These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: umfassen is [ʊmˈfasn̩] while umfassten is [ʊmˈfastn̩]. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they differ by 1 letter(s) in length, and the parts of speech differ too (verb vs adjective), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 57207, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

umfassen is recorded at frequency rank #8,643, classified as averb, pronounced [ʊmˈfasn̩]. umfassten is at rank #48,564, tagged as anadj, pronounced [ʊmˈfastn̩].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 57207, this pair ranks #910,309 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of umfassen vs umfassten

Shared letters: aefmnsu. Private to "umfassen": -. Private to "umfassten": t.

"umfassen" · 8 letters · shape VCCVCCVC  ·  "umfassten" · 9 letters · shape VCCVCCCVC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • umfassen ← mufassen · ufmassen · umafssen · umfasen · umfasesn · umfassenn · umfassne · umfaßen
  • umfassten ← mufassten · ufmassten · umafssten · umfassetn · umfasstenn · umfasstne · umfasstten · umfasten

Frequently Asked Questions

Is swapping "umfassen" for "umfassten" ever safe?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "umfassen" is a verb and "umfassten" an adjective, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
Which is more common, "umfassen" or "umfassten"?
"umfassen" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #8,643 in our German list, against #48,564 for "umfassten". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

Useful next steps

Pronunciation already separates them, if the page still looks alike, the dictionary links below settle it.

  • Full dictionary entry for "umfassen" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "umfassten" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #910,309 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "umfassen" and "umfassten" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "umfasste vs umfassten". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #910,309 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list