recentvsRegensTell them apart

Quick tell: recent is a adjective, Regens is a noun, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“recent” is an adjective and “Regens” is a noun - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#48,411
“recent” frequency rank
#28,350
“Regens” frequency rank
76761
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature recent Regens
Definition kürzlich, jüngst Leiter (insbesondere) eines Priesterseminars

Letter map: recent vs Regens

Shared letters muted; letters that set recent and Regens apart highlighted. Shared run: 4. recent and Regens follow the identical consonant-vowel pattern (CVCVCC). Same shape at a glance is often the real trap, independent of shared letters.

6 ch
recent
6 ch
Regens

Grammar separator: recent vs Regens

Our dataset has no pronunciation recorded for both members, so the reliable separator here is grammatical: recent is anadjective and Regensanoun. On the page they share most of their letters but differ in 2 positions. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 76761, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

recent is recorded at frequency rank #48,411, classified as anadj, pronounced […]. Regens is at rank #28,350, tagged as anoun, pronounced [ˈʁeːɡɛns].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 76761, this pair ranks #276,378 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - among the most confusable pairs.

Orthographic DNA of recent vs Regens

Shared letters: enr. Private to "recent": ct. Private to "Regens": gs.

"recent" · 6 letters · shape CVCVCC  ·  "Regens" · 6 letters · shape CVCVCC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • recent ← ercent · rceent · reccent · recennt · recentt · recetn · recnet · reecnt
  • Regens ← ergens · reegns · regenns · regenss · regesn · reggens · regnes · rgeens

Frequently Asked Questions

Is swapping "recent" for "Regens" ever safe?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "recent" is an adjective and "Regens" a noun, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
In ordinary German text, does "recent" or "Regens" show up more?
"Regens" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #28,350 in our German list, against #48,411 for "recent". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

Useful next steps

Pair "recent" vs "Regens" is on the table, pick a follow-up below.

  • Full dictionary entry for "recent" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "Regens" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #276,378 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "recent" and "Regens" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "puzzles vs recent". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #276,378 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list