observationvssourcesWhich spelling fits?

Quick tell: observation is a noun, sources is a verb, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“observation” is a noun and “sources” is a verb - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#49,936
“observation” frequency rank
#47,003
“sources” frequency rank
96939
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature observation sources
Definition Beobachtung, Observation, Überwachung 3. Person Singular Indikativ Präsens Aktiv des Verbs source

Letter map: observation vs sources

Shared letters muted; letters that set observation and sources apart highlighted. Shared run: 2.

11 ch
observation
7 ch
sources

Role in the sentence - observation and sources

Our dataset has no pronunciation recorded for both members, so the reliable separator here is grammatical: observation is anoun and sourcesaverb. On the page they differ by 4 letter(s) in length. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 96939, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

observation is recorded at frequency rank #49,936, classified as anoun, pronounced […]. sources is at rank #47,003, tagged as averb, pronounced […].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 96939, this pair ranks #5,389 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - among the most confusable pairs.

Orthographic DNA of observation vs sources

Shared letters: eors. Private to "observation": abintv. Private to "sources": cu.

"observation" · 11 letters · shape VCCVCCVCVVC  ·  "sources" · 7 letters · shape CVVCCVC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • observationboservation · obbservation · obesrvation · obseravtion · obserrvation · observaiton · observatino · observationn
  • sourcesosurces · soruces · soucres · sourcces · sourcess · sourcse · sourecs · sourrces

Frequently Asked Questions

Can "observation" and "sources" be used interchangeably?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "observation" is a noun and "sources" a verb, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
In ordinary German text, does "observation" or "sources" show up more?
"sources" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #47,003 in our German list, against #49,936 for "observation". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

After this comparison

Pair "observation" vs "sources" is on the table, pick a follow-up below.

  • Full dictionary entry for "observation" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "sources" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #5,389 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "observation" and "sources" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "observation vs puzzles". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #5,389 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list