Which to use
“habt” and “had” are a confusable German pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.
- #701
- “habt” frequency rank
- #15,906
- “had” frequency rank
- 16607
- confusion score
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | habt | had |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | 2. Person Plural Indikativ Präsens Aktiv des Verbs haben | Präteritum (simple past) des Verbs have |
Where the eye mixes habt and had
Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 2 letters in sequence.
Spelling & Dictionary Insight
A purely visual mix-up. habt ([haːpt]) and had ([hæd]) are said differently, so reading them aloud is the quickest way to catch the wrong one. On the page they stay close: they differ by 1 letter(s) in length. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 16607, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.
habt is recorded at frequency rank #701, classified as averb, pronounced [haːpt]. had is at rank #15,906, tagged as averb, pronounced [hæd].
Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.
With a confusion score of 16607, this pair ranks #1,934,443 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - a relatively easy-to-tell-apart pair.
Orthographic DNA of habt vs had
Shared letters: ah. Private to "habt": bt. Private to "had": d.
"habt" · 4 letters · shape CVCC · "had" · 3 letters · shape CVC
Known mistypes of this pair
- habt ← ahbt · habbt · habtt · hatb · hbat · hhabt
Frequently Asked Questions
Can "habt" and "had" be used interchangeably?
Which is more common, "habt" or "had"?
What to do next
You've compared "habt" and "had". Here's where to go from here.
- Full dictionary entry for "habt" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
- Full dictionary entry for "had" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
- This pair ranks #1,934,443 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
- "habt" and "had" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "had vs haze". Nearby pair
- Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes
PlainSpell is a reference corpus, not spelling advice. Verify unusual forms in context.