geschadetvsgeschändetConfusable pair

Which to use

“geschadet” and “geschändet” are a confusable German pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.

#17,010
“geschadet” frequency rank
#42,530
“geschändet” frequency rank
59540
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature geschadet geschändet
Definition Partizip Perfekt des Verbs schaden Partizip Perfekt des Verbs schänden

Where the eye mixes geschadet and geschändet

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 8 letters in sequence. geschadet runs 9 letters (CVCCCVCVC) against geschändet's 10 (CVCCCVCCVC) - the length gap alone is often enough to separate them once you know to check it.

9 ch
geschadet
10 ch
geschändet

Why the eye confuses geschadet with geschändet

A purely visual mix-up. geschadet ([ɡəˈʃaːdət]) and geschändet ([ɡəˈʃɛndət]) are said differently, so reading them aloud is the quickest way to catch the wrong one. On the page they stay close: they differ by 1 letter(s) in length. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 59540, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

geschadet is recorded at frequency rank #17,010, classified as averb, pronounced [ɡəˈʃaːdət]. geschändet is at rank #42,530, tagged as averb, pronounced [ɡəˈʃɛndət].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 59540, this pair ranks #820,775 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of geschadet vs geschändet

Shared letters: cdeghst. Private to "geschadet": a. Private to "geschändet": .

"geschadet" · 9 letters · shape CVCCCVCVC  ·  "geschändet" · 10 letters · shape CVCCCVCCVC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • geschadetegschadet · gecshadet · gescahdet · gescchadet · geschaddet · geschadett · geschadte · geschaedt

Frequently Asked Questions

Is swapping "geschadet" for "geschändet" ever safe?
No. They are said differently ([ɡəˈʃaːdət] versus [ɡəˈʃɛndət]) and carry different meanings; reading the sentence aloud is usually enough to catch the wrong one.
Which is more common, "geschadet" or "geschändet"?
"geschadet" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #17,010 in our German list, against #42,530 for "geschändet". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

After this comparison

Pronunciation already separates them, if the page still looks alike, the dictionary links below settle it.

  • Full dictionary entry for "geschadet" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "geschändet" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #820,775 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "geschadet" and "geschändet" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "geschändet vs gestrandet". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #820,775 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list