FonvsFoulWhat's the difference?

Quick tell: Fon is a abbrev, Foul is a noun, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“Fon” is an abbrev and “Foul” is a noun - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#43,878
“Fon” frequency rank
#16,991
“Foul” frequency rank
60869
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature Fon Foul
Definition Telefon Regelverstoß, bei dem der Gegenspieler mit unfairen und unsportlichen Mitteln benachteiligt wird

Where the eye mixes Fon and Foul

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 2 letters in sequence. Fon runs 3 letters (CVC) against Foul's 4 (CVVC) - the length gap alone is often enough to separate them once you know to check it.

3 ch
Fon
4 ch
Foul

Why the eye confuses Fon with Foul

These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: Fon is [foːn] while Foul is [faʊ̯l]. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they differ by 1 letter(s) in length, and the parts of speech differ too (abbrev vs noun), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 60869, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

Fon is recorded at frequency rank #43,878, classified as anabbrev, pronounced [foːn]. Foul is at rank #16,991, tagged as anoun, pronounced [faʊ̯l].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 60869, this pair ranks #770,869 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of Fon vs Foul

Shared letters: fo. Private to "Fon": n. Private to "Foul": lu.

"Fon" · 3 letters · shape CVC  ·  "Foul" · 4 letters · shape CVVC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • Foul ← ffoul · folu · foull · fuol · oful

Frequently Asked Questions

Is swapping "Fon" for "Foul" ever safe?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "Fon" is an abbrev and "Foul" a noun, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
Which is more common, "Fon" or "Foul"?
"Foul" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #16,991 in our German list, against #43,878 for "Fon". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

Useful next steps

Eye-level mix-up between "Fon" and "Foul" is sorted above. Next: full entries or other pairs that share a letter shape.

  • Full dictionary entry for "Fon" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "Foul" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #770,869 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "Fon" and "Foul" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "Fock vs Fon". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #770,869 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list