erlegenvserliegenWhat's the difference?

Which to use

“erlegen” and “erliegen” are a confusable German pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.

#24,699
“erlegen” frequency rank
#20,235
“erliegen” frequency rank
44934
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature erlegen erliegen
Definition ein Tier bei der Jagd (durch einen Schuss) töten an etwas sterben

Where the eye mixes erlegen and erliegen

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 7 letters in sequence. erlegen runs 7 letters (VCCVCVC) against erliegen's 8 (VCCVVCVC) - the length gap alone is often enough to separate them once you know to check it.

7 ch
erlegen
8 ch
erliegen

Look-alike desk: erlegen vs erliegen

A purely visual mix-up. erlegen ([ɛɐ̯ˈleːɡn̩]) and erliegen ([ɛɐ̯ˈliːɡn̩]) are said differently, so reading them aloud is the quickest way to catch the wrong one. On the page they stay close: they differ by 1 letter(s) in length. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 44934, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

erlegen is recorded at frequency rank #24,699, classified as averb, pronounced [ɛɐ̯ˈleːɡn̩]. erliegen is at rank #20,235, tagged as averb, pronounced [ɛɐ̯ˈliːɡn̩].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 44934, this pair ranks #1,369,887 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of erlegen vs erliegen

Shared letters: eglnr. Private to "erlegen": -. Private to "erliegen": i.

"erlegen" · 7 letters · shape VCCVCVC  ·  "erliegen" · 8 letters · shape VCCVVCVC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • erlegen ← elregen · erelgen · erleegn · erlegenn · erleggen · erlegne · erlgeen · erllegen
  • erliegen ← elriegen · erilegen · erleigen · erlieegn · erliegenn · erlieggen · erliegne · erligeen

Frequently Asked Questions

Can "erlegen" and "erliegen" be used interchangeably?
No. They are said differently ([ɛɐ̯ˈleːɡn̩] versus [ɛɐ̯ˈliːɡn̩]) and carry different meanings; reading the sentence aloud is usually enough to catch the wrong one.
Which is more common, "erlegen" or "erliegen"?
"erliegen" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #20,235 in our German list, against #24,699 for "erlegen". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

Useful next steps

Pronunciation already separates them, if the page still looks alike, the dictionary links below settle it.

  • Full dictionary entry for "erlegen" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "erliegen" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #1,369,887 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "erlegen" and "erliegen" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "erlegen vs erregten". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #1,369,887 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list