erlebtvserlegtWhich spelling fits?

Which to use

“erlebt” and “erlegt” are a confusable German pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.

#1,879
“erlebt” frequency rank
#30,537
“erlegt” frequency rank
32416
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature erlebt erlegt
Definition Partizip Perfekt des Verbs erleben 2. Person Plural Imperativ Präsens Aktiv des Verbs erlegen

Where the eye mixes erlebt and erlegt

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 5 letters in sequence. erlebt and erlegt follow the identical consonant-vowel pattern (VCCVCC). Same shape at a glance is often the real trap, independent of shared letters.

6 ch
erlebt
6 ch
erlegt

Why the eye confuses erlebt with erlegt

A purely visual mix-up. erlebt ([ɛɐ̯ˈleːpt]) and erlegt ([ɛɐ̯ˈleːkt]) are said differently, so reading them aloud is the quickest way to catch the wrong one. On the page they stay close: they differ by a single letter - b in “erlebt” becomes g in “erlegt”. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 32416, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

erlebt is recorded at frequency rank #1,879, classified as averb, pronounced [ɛɐ̯ˈleːpt]. erlegt is at rank #30,537, tagged as averb, pronounced [ɛɐ̯ˈleːkt].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 32416, this pair ranks #1,708,033 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - a relatively easy-to-tell-apart pair.

Orthographic DNA of erlebt vs erlegt

Shared letters: elrt. Private to "erlebt": b. Private to "erlegt": g.

"erlebt" · 6 letters · shape VCCVCC  ·  "erlegt" · 6 letters · shape VCCVCC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • erlebt ← elrebt · erelbt · erlbet · erlebbt · erlebtt · erletb · erllebt · errlebt
  • erlegt ← elregt · erelgt · erleggt · erlegtt · erletg · erlget · erllegt · errlegt

Frequently Asked Questions

Do "erlebt" and "erlegt" mean the same thing in a sentence?
No. They are said differently ([ɛɐ̯ˈleːpt] versus [ɛɐ̯ˈleːkt]) and carry different meanings; reading the sentence aloud is usually enough to catch the wrong one.
Frequency check: "erlebt" vs "erlegt" - which ranks higher?
"erlebt" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #1,879 in our German list, against #30,537 for "erlegt". That is a wide gap, so in ordinary text the rarer spelling is the one worth double-checking.

Useful next steps

Pronunciation already separates them, if the page still looks alike, the dictionary links below settle it.

  • Full dictionary entry for "erlebt" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "erlegt" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #1,708,033 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "erlebt" and "erlegt" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "Erle vs erlegt". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #1,708,033 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list