ergibtvserlittConfusable pair

Which to use

“ergibt” and “erlitt” are a confusable German pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.

#2,057
“ergibt” frequency rank
#9,363
“erlitt” frequency rank
11420
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature ergibt erlitt
Definition 3. Person Singular Indikativ Präsens Aktiv des Verbs ergeben 1. Person Singular Indikativ Präteritum Aktiv des Verbs erleiden

Where the eye mixes ergibt and erlitt

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 4 letters in sequence. ergibt and erlitt follow the identical consonant-vowel pattern (VCCVCC). Same shape at a glance is often the real trap, independent of shared letters.

6 ch
ergibt
6 ch
erlitt

Look-alike desk: ergibt vs erlitt

A purely visual mix-up. ergibt ([ɛɐ̯ˈɡiːpt]) and erlitt ([ɛɐ̯ˈlɪt]) are said differently, so reading them aloud is the quickest way to catch the wrong one. On the page they stay close: they share most of their letters but differ in 2 positions. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 11420, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

ergibt is recorded at frequency rank #2,057, classified as averb, pronounced [ɛɐ̯ˈɡiːpt]. erlitt is at rank #9,363, tagged as averb, pronounced [ɛɐ̯ˈlɪt].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 11420, this pair ranks #1,969,957 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - a relatively easy-to-tell-apart pair.

Orthographic DNA of ergibt vs erlitt

Shared letters: eirt. Private to "ergibt": bg. Private to "erlitt": l.

"ergibt" · 6 letters · shape VCCVCC  ·  "erlitt" · 6 letters · shape VCCVCC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • ergibtegribt · ergbit · erggibt · ergibbt · ergibtt · ergitb · erigbt · errgibt
  • erlittelritt · eriltt · erlit · erllitt · erltit · errlitt · relitt

Frequently Asked Questions

Is swapping "ergibt" for "erlitt" ever safe?
No. They are said differently ([ɛɐ̯ˈɡiːpt] versus [ɛɐ̯ˈlɪt]) and carry different meanings; reading the sentence aloud is usually enough to catch the wrong one.
In ordinary German text, does "ergibt" or "erlitt" show up more?
"ergibt" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #2,057 in our German list, against #9,363 for "erlitt". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

What to do next

Eye-level mix-up between "ergibt" and "erlitt" is sorted above. Next: full entries or other pairs that share a letter shape.

  • Full dictionary entry for "ergibt" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "erlitt" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #1,969,957 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "ergibt" and "erlitt" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "erliegt vs erlitt". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #1,969,957 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list