effectsvswithinTell them apart

Quick tell: effects is a verb, within is a preposition, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“effects” is a verb and “within” is a preposition - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#24,305
“effects” frequency rank
#29,872
“within” frequency rank
54177
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature effects within
Definition 3. Person Singular Indikativ Präsens Aktiv des Verbs effect innerhalb, in

Letter map: effects vs within

Shared letters muted; letters that set effects and within apart highlighted. Shared run: 1. effects runs 7 letters (VCCVCCC) against within's 6 (CVCCVC) - the length gap alone is often enough to separate them once you know to check it.

7 ch
effects
6 ch
within

Role in the sentence - effects and within

Our dataset has no pronunciation recorded for both members, so the reliable separator here is grammatical: effects is averb and withinapreposition. On the page they differ by 1 letter(s) in length. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 54177, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

effects is recorded at frequency rank #24,305, classified as averb, pronounced […]. within is at rank #29,872, tagged as aprep, pronounced […].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 54177, this pair ranks #1,029,134 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of effects vs within

Shared letters: t. Private to "effects": cefs. Private to "within": hinw.

"effects" · 7 letters · shape VCCVCCC  ·  "within" · 6 letters · shape CVCCVC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • effectsefects · efefcts · effcets · effeccts · effecst · effectss · effectts · effetcs
  • withiniwthin · wihtin · withhin · withinn · withni · witihn · witthin · wtihin

Frequently Asked Questions

Do "effects" and "within" mean the same thing in a sentence?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "effects" is a verb and "within" a preposition, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
Which is more common, "effects" or "within"?
"effects" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #24,305 in our German list, against #29,872 for "within". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

After this comparison

You've compared "effects" and "within". Here's where to go from here.

  • Full dictionary entry for "effects" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "within" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #1,029,134 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "effects" and "within" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "puzzles vs within". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #1,029,134 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list