effectsvswaleWhich spelling fits?

Quick tell: effects is a verb, wale is a noun, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“effects” is a verb and “wale” is a noun - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#24,305
“effects” frequency rank
#23,369
“wale” frequency rank
47674
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature effects wale
Definition 3. Person Singular Indikativ Präsens Aktiv des Verbs effect Rippe, Salleiste, feste Webkante

Letter map: effects vs wale

Shared letters muted; letters that set effects and wale apart highlighted. Shared run: 1. effects runs 7 letters (VCCVCCC) against wale's 4 (CVCV) - the length gap alone is often enough to separate them once you know to check it.

7 ch
effects
4 ch
wale

Part-of-speech tell for effects / wale

Our dataset has no pronunciation recorded for both members, so the reliable separator here is grammatical: effects is averb and waleanoun. On the page they differ by 3 letter(s) in length. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 47674, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

effects is recorded at frequency rank #24,305, classified as averb, pronounced […]. wale is at rank #23,369, tagged as anoun, pronounced […].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 47674, this pair ranks #1,276,050 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of effects vs wale

Shared letters: e. Private to "effects": cfst. Private to "wale": alw.

"effects" · 7 letters · shape VCCVCCC  ·  "wale" · 4 letters · shape CVCV

Known mistypes of this pair

  • effectsefects · efefcts · effcets · effeccts · effecst · effectss · effectts · effetcs
  • waleawle · wael · walle · wlae · wwale

Frequently Asked Questions

Do "effects" and "wale" mean the same thing in a sentence?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "effects" is a verb and "wale" a noun, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
In ordinary German text, does "effects" or "wale" show up more?
"wale" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #23,369 in our German list, against #24,305 for "effects". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

What to do next

You've compared "effects" and "wale". Here's where to go from here.

  • Full dictionary entry for "effects" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "wale" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #1,276,050 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "effects" and "wale" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "effects vs puzzles". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #1,276,050 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list