effectsvsnearTell them apart

Quick tell: effects is a verb, near is an adjective, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“effects” is a verb and “near” is an adjective - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#24,305
“effects” frequency rank
#33,730
“near” frequency rank
58035
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature effects near
Definition 3. Person Singular Indikativ Präsens Aktiv des Verbs effect nahe

Letter map: effects vs near

Shared letters muted; letters that set effects and near apart highlighted. Shared run: 1. effects runs 7 letters (VCCVCCC) against near's 4 (CVVC) - the length gap alone is often enough to separate them once you know to check it.

7 ch
effects
4 ch
near

Grammar separator: effects vs near

Our dataset has no pronunciation recorded for both members, so the reliable separator here is grammatical: effects is averb and nearanadjective. On the page they differ by 3 letter(s) in length. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 58035, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

effects is recorded at frequency rank #24,305, classified as averb, pronounced […]. near is at rank #33,730, tagged as anadj, pronounced […].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 58035, this pair ranks #878,265 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of effects vs near

Shared letters: e. Private to "effects": cfst. Private to "near": anr.

"effects" · 7 letters · shape VCCVCCC  ·  "near" · 4 letters · shape CVVC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • effectsefects · efefcts · effcets · effeccts · effecst · effectss · effectts · effetcs
  • nearenar · naer · nearr · nera · nnear

Frequently Asked Questions

Is swapping "effects" for "near" ever safe?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "effects" is a verb and "near" an adjective, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
In ordinary German text, does "effects" or "near" show up more?
"effects" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #24,305 in our German list, against #33,730 for "near". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

After this comparison

Done with this confusable. These links stay specific to "effects" and "near".

  • Full dictionary entry for "effects" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "near" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #878,265 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "effects" and "near" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "near vs puzzles". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #878,265 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list