beträgtvsbetrügtTell them apart

Quick tell: beträgt is a unknown, betrügt is a verb, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“beträgt” is an unknown and “betrügt” is a verb - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#1,656
“beträgt” frequency rank
#26,780
“betrügt” frequency rank
28436
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature beträgt betrügt
Definition 3. Person Singular Indikativ Präsens Aktiv von betragen 2. Person Plural Konjunktiv II Präteritum Aktiv des Verbs betragen

Where the eye mixes beträgt and betrügt

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 6 letters in sequence. beträgt and betrügt follow the identical consonant-vowel pattern (CVCCVCC). Same shape at a glance is often the real trap, independent of shared letters.

7 ch
beträgt
7 ch
betrügt

Why the eye confuses beträgt with betrügt

These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: beträgt is [bəˈtʁɛːkt] while betrügt is [bəˈtʁyːkt]. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they differ by a single letter - ä in “beträgt” becomes ü in “betrügt”, and the parts of speech differ too (unknown vs verb), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 28436, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

beträgt is recorded at frequency rank #1,656, classified as anunknown, pronounced [bəˈtʁɛːkt]. betrügt is at rank #26,780, tagged as averb, pronounced [bəˈtʁyːkt].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 28436, this pair ranks #1,784,792 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - a relatively easy-to-tell-apart pair.

Orthographic DNA of beträgt vs betrügt

Shared letters: begrt. Private to "beträgt": ä. Private to "betrügt": ü.

"beträgt" · 7 letters · shape CVCCVCC  ·  "betrügt" · 7 letters · shape CVCCVCC

Frequently Asked Questions

Can "beträgt" and "betrügt" be used interchangeably?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "beträgt" is an unknown and "betrügt" a verb, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
Which is more common, "beträgt" or "betrügt"?
"beträgt" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #1,656 in our German list, against #26,780 for "betrügt". That is a wide gap, so in ordinary text the rarer spelling is the one worth double-checking.

Useful next steps

Pronunciation already separates them, if the page still looks alike, the dictionary links below settle it.

  • Full dictionary entry for "beträgt" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "betrügt" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #1,784,792 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "beträgt" and "betrügt" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "beitrug vs betrügt". Nearby pair

Confusion rank #1,784,792 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list