begabtvsbehältTell them apart

Quick tell: begabt is a adjective, behält is a verb, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“begabt” is an adjective and “behält” is a verb - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#23,436
“begabt” frequency rank
#8,031
“behält” frequency rank
31467
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature begabt behält
Definition Talent besitzend 3. Person Singular Indikativ Präsens Aktiv des Verbs behalten

Where the eye mixes begabt and behält

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 3 letters in sequence. begabt and behält follow the identical consonant-vowel pattern (CVCVCC). Same shape at a glance is often the real trap, independent of shared letters.

6 ch
begabt
6 ch
behält

Look-alike desk: begabt vs behält

These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: begabt is [bəˈɡaːpt] while behält is [bəˈhɛlt]. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they share most of their letters but differ in 3 positions, and the parts of speech differ too (adjective vs verb), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 31467, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

begabt is recorded at frequency rank #23,436, classified as anadj, pronounced [bəˈɡaːpt]. behält is at rank #8,031, tagged as averb, pronounced [bəˈhɛlt].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 31467, this pair ranks #1,727,510 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - a relatively easy-to-tell-apart pair.

Orthographic DNA of begabt vs behält

Shared letters: bet. Private to "begabt": ag. Private to "behält": hlä.

"begabt" · 6 letters · shape CVCVCC  ·  "behält" · 6 letters · shape CVCVCC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • begabt ← bbegabt · beagbt · begabbt · begabtt · begatb · begbat · beggabt · bgeabt

Frequently Asked Questions

Is swapping "begabt" for "behält" ever safe?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "begabt" is an adjective and "behält" a verb, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
Which is more common, "begabt" or "behält"?
"behält" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #8,031 in our German list, against #23,436 for "begabt". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

Useful next steps

Pronunciation already separates them, if the page still looks alike, the dictionary links below settle it.

  • Full dictionary entry for "begabt" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "behält" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #1,727,510 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "begabt" and "behält" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "begabt vs begebe". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #1,727,510 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list